Cause, Effect, and the Future of Society

Cause, Effect, and the Future of Society
This is part of a series of reflections on how individual behavior, collective response, and governing systems influence one another—and how these relationships quietly shape the direction of society over time.

There are moments in history that do not pass quietly.

They do not fade into the background cycle of news, outrage, and distraction. They stay. They sit in the body. They ask something of us.

The killing of Renee Nicole Good is one of those moments.

Because when people look at Renee, they don’t see an abstract headline.
They see themselves.
They see their sister.
Their partner.
Their wife.
The mother of their child.
Their daughter.

They see a life that should still be here.

And when that recognition happens, distance collapses. So does denial.

This Is How Cause and Effect Begins

This moment did not come out of nowhere.

It is the result of years of accumulated tension — fear, power, mistrust, and systems that no longer feel accountable to the people they are meant to serve.

In our personal lives, real change rarely happens gently.
It happens when something breaks us open.
When we are brought to our knees.
When what we believed was stable suddenly isn’t.

Societies are no different.

For deep change to happen, there is often a moment that exposes what can no longer be justified, explained away, or emotionally survived.

This is one of those moments.

Not because people are merely angry — anger fades.
But because people recognize themselves.

And recognition creates responsibility.

Renee Nicole Good Will Not Be Reduced to a Moment

There is a quiet violence that often follows tragedy — the reduction of a life into a debate, a talking point, or a temporary wave of attention.

That cannot happen here.

Renee Nicole Good was a whole human being.
Her life mattered before her death, not because of it.

Saying her death will not be in vain does not mean pretending loss has purpose.
It means refusing to allow indifference to have the final word.

It means acknowledging that when a system takes a life without accountability, something breaks — not only in policy, but in the collective conscience.

People are not responding to this moment because it is trending.
They are responding because they recognize themselves in her.

The People Are Done Looking Away

Across the country, something has shifted.

People are protesting.
They are standing up — to ICE, to government actions, to systems they believe are harming people.
They are making themselves visible in ways that carry real risk.

That takes courage.

Not everyone has the capacity to stand in the street. I know I don’t. And naming that isn’t weakness — it’s honesty.

But courage takes many forms.

Some people stand with their bodies.
Others stand by refusing silence.
Others stand by witnessing, remembering, and telling the truth clearly, without distortion.

What matters is this:
the American people are no longer willing to let moments like this be washed away.

This is cause and effect.

When systems fail repeatedly, people stop asking politely for reform.
They stop assuming protection will come from above.
They begin insisting — quietly or publicly — that something has to change.

Policing Cannot Remain the Same

This is not an ideological statement.
It is a reality-based one.

Policing cannot remain unchanged at the federal, national, state, and local levels — not because of pressure alone, but because public moral consent is eroding.

When people no longer believe a system protects people like them, they do not immediately revolt.

They withdraw trust.
They withdraw cooperation.
They withdraw emotional legitimacy.

And systems that lose legitimacy are eventually forced to adapt — or be replaced by something smaller, closer, and more human.

Change will be slow. It always is. It’s inevitable.
But slow does not mean optional.

The Future Taking Shape

What we are witnessing now is not collapse.
It is reorientation.

As trust in large institutions weakens, people stop looking outward for authority and begin looking inward — to families, to neighbors, to communities, to chosen circles both physical and online.

Not because they reject order.
But because they want order with humanity intact.

The future will not be louder.
It will be more watchful.
More managed.
More technologically mediated.

But it will also be more intimate.
More community-driven.
More reliant on memory, elders, and moral grounding.

Renee Nicole Good should still be here.
We cannot undo that.

What we can do is refuse to let her be forgotten, minimized, or absorbed into silence.

Change does not begin with systems.
It begins when people are done pretending nothing happened.

And many people are done.

How Policing Evolves

This won’t look like armed drones hovering over every street.

It will look like:

1. Less visible human presence

• Fewer patrol officers walking neighborhoods

• More response-based policing instead of preventative presence

• Police arrive after something triggers a system

2. More automated observation

• Drones for:

• Traffic enforcement

• Search and rescue

• Crowd monitoring at events

• Perimeter surveillance

• Fixed sensors:

• License plate readers

• Facial recognition (even if “restricted,” it will exist)

• Pattern-analysis tools

Most enforcement won’t feel like “being policed.”
It will feel like systems noticing you.

The Key Shift: From Judgment to Detection

Human policing involves discretion:

• Mood

• Context

• Mercy

• Bias (both harmful and humanizing)

AI policing removes discretion.

It doesn’t ask why.
It flags what.

That means:

• Fewer confrontations

• Fewer conversations

• Fewer second chances

But also:

• Fewer warnings

• Less nuance

• Less relational authority

Authority becomes impersonal and absolute, not negotiated.

Why Governments Will Prefer This

This isn’t about control fantasy. It’s about:

• Cost

• Liability

• Predictability

• Workforce shortages

Human officers:

• Burn out

• Make mistakes

• Carry moral weight

• Require public trust

Systems don’t.

So governments will frame this as:

• “Efficiency”

• “Safety”

• “Bias reduction”

• “Modernization”

And many people will accept it—because it’s less emotionally taxing than human conflict.

When authority becomes:

• Automated

• Remote

• Non-relational

People stop appealing to it emotionally.

They stop asking:

“Will they understand?”

And start asking:

“How do I stay out of the system?”

That’s when people turn inward—to family, neighbors, trusted circles.

Not because they’re antisocial.
Because systems don’t know them.

In New England:

• People already avoid unnecessary attention

• Communities value privacy and quiet self-regulation

• Mutual aid fills gaps naturally

So what happens?

• People self-regulate more

• Communities resolve small issues internally

• Elders, teachers, and community figures regain soft authority

Not officially.
But functionally.

A Subtle but Profound Outcome

As external enforcement becomes more abstract,
internal ethics matter more.

People raised with:

• Clear values

• Emotional regulation

• Community accountability

Do fine.

People without those anchors feel disoriented—watched but unseen.

This is why meaning, ritual, and moral grounding quietly return.

One Clear Truth

When authority loses its human face, people lean more heavily on human relationships to guide behavior.

Who vouches for you.
Who stands with you.
Who knows your story.

This is our future.

*Check back weekly for more